Vemurafenib is a very focused PLX4032-medication with BRAF mutation and turns out molecules targeting tumors with good results to ensure melanoompatienten in stage IIIc with and IV. FDA gives official approval as per direct vemurafenib-zelboraf melanoompatienten with appropriate medication for BRAF expression. Article update 18 april 2012
19 August 2011: source: FDA-US Food and Drug Adminstration
The FDA has per direct vemurafenib-officially classified as a medicine for Zelboraf melanoompatienten in advanced stage (stage III/IV), with the correct BRAF expression. Click here for permission report. Also read the following article with a link to the full study report that served as a basis for the FDA permission.
6 jun i 2011: Source cape Meds and Asco
The Center also known under the codename vemurafenib, PLX4032 became known at ASCO 2011 presented as a breakthrough in the treatment of melanomas with a BRAF expression. ca. 50% to 60% of people with a melanoma would these have, according to the researchers at ASCO BRAF expression 2011. On the results from a phase III study were ASCO presented. Incidentally, that study is not placebo-controlled but the control group received the usual chemo dacarzabine. All patientsin thestudyhad a inoperabele,not previously treatedstageIIICorstageIVmelanoma andtested positivefortheBRAFV600Emutation. That means that patients were not double-blind randomised preselected so. Noteworthy is also that only 5% of the group that dacarzabine only got this succeeded. This study therefore would simply show that dacarzabine just not a good chemo for melanoma patients with a BRAF expression. That would explain a lot about the study results.
Turned out after 6 months desurvival 84% (95%confidence interval [BI], 78to 89)indeGroup that had gotten added vemurafenib and 64% (95%CI, 56to 73)intheGroup. dacarbazineThere are still Nomedian overall overlevingcijfers of thestudy, becausethedata still not the end of the follow-up study, the authors have thus achieved, The resultsforprogression-free survivalare final;patientswhovemurafenib5.3 had had gottenmonths disease-free time to progression occurred, comparedwith 1.6months intheGroup, says Dr.dacarbazineChapman, research leader at ASCO 2011. All in all, a result which is not bad, but not described as a breakthrough can be like their audience wanted to do what the researchers believe.
Here is the abstract of the study and if you want to read the entire study report click here, it's free.
Source: NEJM
Improved Survival with BRAF V600E Mutation in Melanoma with Vemurafenib
Paul B. Chapman, M.D., Axel Gina, M.D., Caroline Robert, M.D., Ph.d., John B. Haanen, M.D., Paolo Ascierto, M.D., James Larkin, M.D., Reinhard Dummer, M.D., Claus Garbe, M.D., Alessandro Testori, M.D., Michele Maio, M.D., David Hogg, M.D., Paul Lorigan, M.D., Celeste Lebbe, M.D., Thomas Jouary, M.D., Dirk Schadendorf, M.D., Antoni Ribas, M.D., Steven j. O'Day, M.D., Jeffrey a. Sosman, M.D., John m. Kirkwood, M.D., Alexander m.m. Eggermont, M.D., Ph.d., Brigitte Dreno, M.D., Ph.d., Keith Nolop, M.D., Jiang Li, Ph.d., Betty Nelson, M.A., Jeannie Hou, M.D., Richard j. Lee, M.D., Keith t. Flaherty, M.D., and Grant a. McArthur, M.B., B.S., Ph.d. for the BRIM-3 Study Group
June 5, 2011 (10.1056/NEJMoa1103782)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
-
Background
Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of the BRAF kinase inhibitor response rates or vemurafenib (PLX4032) have shown more than 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma BRAF V600E mutation with the.
Methods
We conducted a phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated vemurafenib with 675, with the BRAF mutation V600E. metastatic melanoma Patients were randomly assigned to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival rates of overall and. Secondary end points included the response rate, response duration, and safety. A final analysis was planned after 196 deaths and an interim analysis after 98 deaths.
Results
At 6 months, overall survival was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 89) in the vemurafenib group and 64% (95% CI, 56 to 73) in the dacarbazine group. In the interim analysis for overall survival and progression-free survival, final analysis for vemurafenib was associated with a relative reduction in the risk of death and or 63% or 74% in the risk of either death or disease progression, as compared with dacarbazine (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). After review of the interim analysis by an independent data and safety monitoring board, crossover from vemurafenib to dacarbazine was recommended. Response rates were 48% for vemurafenib and 5% for dacarbazine. Common adverse events associated with arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia vemurafenib were, squamous-cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma or photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea; 38% of patients required dose modification because of toxic effects.
Conclusions
Vemurafenib produced improved overall and progression-free survival rates of patients with previously untreated in BRAF mutation V600E melanoma with the. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; BRIM-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01006980.
Balch CM, S-J, YOU Gershenwald, Soong et al. melanoma AJCC staging and classification or Final version 2009. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 6199-6206
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
2
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward e. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300 [Erratum, CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 133-4.]
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
3
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: GLOBOCAN 2008, IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010. (http://globocan.iarc.fr.)
4
Chapman PB, Einhorn LH, Meyers ML, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus metastatic melanoma dacarbazine in patients with. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: mountain-2751
Web of Science | Medline
5
MR. Middleton, Grob JJ, Aaronson N, et al. Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 158-166
Web of Science | Medline
6
Avril MF, Aamdal S, Grob JJ, et al. "disseminated malignant Fotemustine compared with dacarbazine in patients with melanoma: a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1118-1125
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
7
Millward M, Pehamberger H, Bedikian AY, et al. Bcl-2 antisense (oblimersen sodium) plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: the Melanoma Study Group Oblimersen. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4745-4738
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
8
Commissioner androulla Vassiliou FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma Patients with. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:711-723 [N Engl J Med 2010;-Erratum, 1953899113.]
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline
9
Wolchok JD, Thomas L, Bondarenko IN, et al. A phase 3 randomized study of ipilimumab (IPI) plus dacarbazine (DTIC) versus DTIC alone as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: Suppl:LBA5-LBA5
10
Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. 417:949-954 Nature 2002;
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
11
Curtin Yes, Kageshita T, et al. J Fridlyand, Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2135-2147
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline
12
Hirth P, Tsai J, Bollag G, et al. Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma. 467:596-599 Nature 2010;
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
13
Tsai J, Lee JT, Wang W, et al. selective inhibitor or Discovery of a B-Raf kinase antimelanoma oncogenic with potent activity. Proc Natl Sci U S A 2008; 105:3041-3046
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
14
Joseph EW Pratilas, CA, PI, et al. Poulikakos The RAF inhibitor inhibits tumor cell proliferation in PLX4032 ERK signaling and BRAF V600E a-selective manner. Proc Natl Sci U S A 14908-107:14903 2010;
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
15
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, et al. Inhibition of mutated BRAF in metastatic melanoma, activated. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:809-819
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline
16
Ribas A, Kim KB, Shyly LM, et al. BRIM-2: an open-label, multicenter phase II study of vemurafenib in previously treated patients with mutation-positive melanoma BRAFV600E. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: Suppl:8509-8509
17
Pocock SJ, Altman DG, Clayton TC. Survival plots or time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls. Lancet 2002;359:1686-1689
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
18
Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma or associations. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1239-1246
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
19
He I, Sanchez-B, Packer L, et al. Laorden Oncogenic BRAF schizophrenia melanoma cell invasion by downregulating the cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE5A. Cancer Cell 2011; 19: 45-57
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
20
Kumar R, Angelini S, K, et al. mutations in BRAF Czene metastatic melanoma: a possible association with clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 3362-3 368
Web of Science | Medline
21
Williams VL, Cohen PR, Stewart DJ. Premalignant and malignant skin lesions Sorafenib-induced. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50: 396-402
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
22
Kwon EJ, Kish LS Jaworsky, C. The histologic spectrum or epithelial neoplasms induced by sorafenib. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61: 522-527
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
23
Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, G, Bollag, RAF inhibitors transactivate Shokat KM n. Rosen and ERK signalling in cells dimers RAF with wild-type BRAF. Nature 2010;464:427-430
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
24
Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, RAF inhibitors prime wild-type et al. RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. 464:431-435 Nature 2010;
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
25
Milagre Heidorn SJ, C, Whittaker S, et al. RAS oncogenic BRAF Kinase-dead and cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 2010;140:209-221
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
26
Johannessen CM, Boehm JS, Kim SY, et al. COT drives resistance to RAF kinase pathway inhibition through reactivation FOLDER. Nature 2010;468:968-972
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
27
Nazarian R, Shi H, Wang Q, et al. Melanomas acquire resistance to B-RAF (V600E) inhibition by RTK or N-RAS upregulation. 468:973-977 Nature 2010;
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
28
Villanueva, J A, Lee JT, et al. Vultur Acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors mediated by a RAF kinase switch in melanoma can be overcome by MEK and IGF-1R/PI3K cotargeting. Cancer Cell 2010; 18: 683-695
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
23 January 2011: Meds cape
New results would demonstrate that the new experimental drug, PLX4032, code name RG7204 or for a longer disease free time can provide patients with melanomas with a BRAF expression. This producer Roche/Genentech informs Meds cape but yet no study results can and want to publish. Bit strange but perhaps also understandable if you look at the other study results and doctors say that it means known for many patients respond but only short time is employed. Yet other oncologists optimistic and positive about latest study results. Read below in succession a number of publications on this new medium. Starting with quote from article by Meds cape d.d. 19 January 2011.
"A Major Breakthrough"
The results of a phase 1 trial presented last year drew praise and enthusiasm from the oncology community. In a phase 1 dose-escalation study, 81% of patients whose melanomas had an activating mutation in BRAF responded to the treatment (N Engl J Med2010; 363:809-819.). This represents "a major breakthrough," according to the authors of an editorial that accompanied the published study (N Engl J Med2010;363:876.-879).
The results of an open-label phase 2 trial seemingly confirmed these early dates. As reported by Meds cape Medical News, or the 132 patients with advanced melanoma positive for the BRAF mutation, 82% experienced a response (52%) or stable disease (30%), and 52% experienced a decrease in their tumor size or 30% or more.
In the median progression-free survival phase 2 trial, was 6.2 months, which was much higher than the 2 months historically seen in this patient population. Overall survival is usually in the range of 6 to 9 months, but median overall survival had not yet been reached when the results were presented at the 7th International Melanoma Research Congress of the Society for Melanoma Research in Sydney, Australia in November 2010.
At that time, Antoni Ribas, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at MD, from the the University of California in Los Angeles, who was involved in both the phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials, told Meds cape Medical News that the responses were not durable. However, he speculated that response to RG7204 might lead to an improvement in survival by shifting the first part of the survival curve about by a few months.
26 november 2010: cape Meds Source
A new phase II study has confirmed that the response, hitting the new drug, PLX4032 (RG7204) against melanomas, remains high (see below abstract of promising study). There, however, it now appears that this response is not so very long persisted. Turns out it worked out already after 2 to 7 months. This will be apparent from a phase II study with 132 patients with BRAF mutation melanomas that the good had. A quote from article by meds cape about this new study, which you can read the full article if you click here.
In Early results from a phase 1 study of melanoma — 32 melanoma patients with a mutation in a BRAF — showed "remarkable 81% of patients responses," which "represent a major breakthrough," enthused the authors of an editorial that accompanied the publication of the study in the NewEngland Journal of Medicine (2010; 363; 809-819, 876-879).
The latest clinical results, presented recently at the International Melanoma Research Congress of the Society for Melanoma Research in Sydney, Australia, confirm the high response rates.
They come from an open-label phase 2 trial of 132 patients with previously treated advanced melanoma positive for the BRAF mutation. Researchers report that 82% of patients had a response (52%) or stable disease (30%), and 52% had a decrease in their tumor size or 30% or more.
The median progression-free survival in these patients was 6.2 months; typically progression-free survival for such patients is only about 2 months, according to the researchers. Overall survival is typically around 6 to 9 months, they add, but the median overall survival has not yet been reached in the trial.
The safety profile is similar to that already reported for the experimental agent, and includes the development cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or the grade 3 again, this time in 26% (34 or 132) patients. In these cases, the cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma lesions were excised and the patients continued with the experimental therapy. In addition, abnormal liver function was reported in 14% of patients, joint pain/arthritis in 11%, and gastrointestinal symptoms (including gastritis and pancreatitis) in 10%. Rash, photosensitivity, and hair loss were also reported.
......
The responses are not durable; they last for an average of about 7 months before the disease progresses, Dr. Ribas noted. Even so, he speculates that the response to the drug might lead to an improvement in survival by shifting the first part of the survival curve about by a few months.
24 February 2010: source: Pubmed and Plexxikon Inc.
Seems to be a drug PLX4032 that part of the incurable melanoompatienten can give hope back on a recovery. Several studies in recent years have already proved that a drug PLX4032 (RG7204), with a very focused on tumors, particularly with those melanoompatienten BRAF mutation BRAF mutation (ca. 50% of all melanoomtumorn have these BRAS mutation, the researchers said) achieved good results. Last week came the producer of the first results of PLX4032 outward ett a randomized phase III study that confirmed the earlier results from phase II studies.
Plexxikon Inc. successively a press release from here and a few quotes from article from Elsevier Global Medical News. Here you can read a comprehensive article on targeted approach with molecules.
Plexxikon Announces First Patient Dosed In Phase 3 Trial Of PLX4032 (RG7204) For Metastatic Melanoma
Berkeley, CA — January 8, 2010
Plexxikon Inc. announces that enrollment has been initiated and the first patient dosed in a pivotal Phase 3 trial has been or in patients with metastatic melanoma PLX4032 (RG7204). PLX4032 is a novel, oral and highly targeted drug that is designed to inhibit the causingmutation that occurs in BRAF cancer-about 50 percent of melanomas and about eight percent of all solid tumors. The randomized, controlled, Phase 3 "BRAFInhibitor in Melanoma" (BRIM3) in previously untreated patients trial is part of the planned registration program for PLX4032. The initiation of the Phase 3 trial has triggered a significant milestone payment to from Roche, its co-development partner Plexxikon, under their 2006 collaboration agreement. Plexxikon is also entitled to receive additional payments for further milestone achievements as well as royalties on sales of PLX4032. A Phase 2 trial in previously treated melanoma patients (BRIM2) was initiated in September 2009, with ongoing enrollment.
"With some tumor mutation-positive melanoma patients krimp in nearly all, and 70 percent of patients achieving at least 30 percent tumor in our most recent clinical study, krimp PLX4032 has shown meaningful anti-tumor activity. The Phase 3 trial, with a primary endpoint of overall survival, will provide an assessment of clinical benefit in a randomized, controlled study design or PLX4032, which should further build our registration program for this drug, "stated k. Peter Hirth, Ph.d., chief executive officer or Plexxikon.
BRIM3 is a Phase 3 trial expected to enroll approximately 700 previously untreated melanoma patients who will be randomized one-to-one with PLX4032 at a dose or 960 mg BID or dacarbazine (DTIC), a drug approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma comparator. Patients will be monitored throughout the study for safety and efficacy endpoints. The primary endpoint of this trial is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression-free survival and best overall response rate (BORR). The trial is a multicentre study being conducted BRIM3 at approximately 100 sites, including sites in the United States, Australia, Europe and Canada, with sites continuing to open through Q2 2010.
BRIM2 is a Phase 2 trial expected to enroll approximately 100 patients and is a single-arm study in previously treated melanoma patients. This trial is enrolling patients at 13 sites in the U.S. and Australia.
Patients enrolling in both BRIM3 and BRIM2 are being selected using an investigational companion diagnostic test that detects the BRAF mutation. This diagnostic is being developed in parallel with co-PLX4032 by Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. and Plexxikon. Patients interested in enrolling in the BRIM2 or BRIM3 trials may find additional information at the Roche Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.roche-trials.com/), at genentechclinicaltrials@druginfo.com, by visiting www.clinicaltrials.gov, or by contacting the Roche/Genentech Call Center at 888-662-6728.
Phase 1 Data Support Advanced Clinical Development Program for PLX4032
Promising data from the Phase 1 extension in mutation-positive melanoma patients cohort were recently presented at the ECCO/ESMO conference September 2009, and provided support for the initiation of the pivotal Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials in melanoma. These data showed some tumor in nearly all patients treated with PLX4032 krimp, and 70 percent of patients achieving at least 30% tumor by krimp RECIST criteria. Patients in the Phase 1 melanoma extension cohort were treated with PLX4032 960 mg twice daily at a dose of (BID), which was well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events were predominantly mild in severity, including rash, joint pain, fatigue and photosensitivity. Skin squamous cell carcinoma (subtype keratoacanthoma) was observed in 20 percent of patients and removed by excision while treatment with PLX4032 was continued.
Plexxikon conducted the Phase 1 dose escalation cohort and mutation-positive melanoma patients cohort in an extension. The company has also completed enrollment in a second mutation-positive colorectal cancer patients cohort extension or. Roche, Genentech, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, are conducting all future clinical trials or PLX4032, including BRIM2 and BRIM3.
BRAFMutation in Melanoma and Other Cancers
The BRAF mutation has been shown, both in preclinical studies and clinical studies, to be a key driver PLX4032 or cancer, particularly in melanoma. This mutation is present in approximately 50 percent of melanoma skin cancers. Overall, about eight percent of all solid tumours carry this mutation, including melanoma, colorectal, thyroid, biliary tract, prostate, ovarian, lung and glioma cancers. The BRAF mutation represents a unique target for cancer therapy since the mutation occurs only in tumor cells and not in normal cells. The high degree of selectivity or PLX4032 for this target has enabled sufficient dose levels to achieve about 90 percent inhibition required for tumour krimp.
Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma Takes Centerstage PLX4032
Thursday, October 01, 2009-Elsevier Global Medical News
BERLIN (EGMN) – An investigational agent that targets the BRAF mutation and is present in at least half of melanoma patients has shown impressive results in a second phase I trial.
Response rates with the oral agent PLX4032 reached an unprecedented 70% in metastatic melanoma, signaling a fundamental shift in the way this deadly disease will be treated.
"What's very encouraging is actually that the response rate in nonmutated melanoma is 0%; so we know exactly what we're doing, "European Cancer Organization (ECCO) president Prof. Alexander Eggermont told reporters at the joint congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology, ECCO and where the latest data were presented.
The ability to target therapy based on genetic mutation status is expected to transform the once-bleak field of melanoma, which has seen no improvement in overall survival in the last 30 randomized trials using various chemotherapeutic agents and vaccines. The 5-year survival rate for stage IV melanoma remains at just 18%.
"If I have a young, talented medical oncologist at a cancer center, now I would have no reservations to recommend him to become a melanoma specialist because it's going to become a very exciting field instead of a graveyard," Prof. Eggermont Erasmus University in Rotterdam said at a press or briefing. "One of the fellows here said, ' Wow, this is fantastic; now I will get time to get to know my metastatic melanoma patients. ' That's how bad the field was. So this is simply fantastic. "
The phase I extension metastatic melanoma patients who had a trial included 31 BRAF mutation V600E and who were treated twice daily known as with 960 mg or PLX4032. Among 27 evaluable patients, the response rate was 70% by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), including 18 partial responses and 1 complete response. One partial responder subsequently became a complete responder after the data analysis cutoff date.
Progression-free survival is about 8.5 months, although the median has not yet been reached, lead author Dr. Paul Chapman said during a presidential session. Overall survival was not measured. Tumor on MRI showed that after just 15 days krimp or treatment, FDG (fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose) uptake was essentially shut down.
"We are seeing responses in sites we don't see, like the bowel," he said. "Liver metastases are also susceptible to this treatment. Bone metastases, which I've rarely seen, respond. "
Enthusiasm for the study, which was supported by Plexxicon Inc., was not diminished by the preliminary nature of the data or a string or disappointing late-phase results from other promising melanoma agents.
"My take – and I think it's pretty representative of many in the academic world – is that this is cataclysmic melanoma; this is hugely important, "Dr. David e. Fisher, chief of the dermatology service and director of the cutaneous biology research center at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, said in an interview. "The distinction or this from the vast majority of prior early trial data that looked promising is that this has a predictive component to it."
Clinicians can predict which patients will respond and which won't, based on the presence of the BRAFV600E mutation. In addition, there is a very compelling precisely how this drug works and mechanistic connection between the nature of the clinical response, he said.
In a previous phase I dose-escalation trial in 55 patients with a variety of cancers, partial responses were reported in metastatic melanoma patients with 9 or 16 the BRAFV600E mutation who received sufficiently high doses or PLX4032. Patients lacking the BRAF mutation did not respond, according to data presented at this year's annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Because of the selectivity of the molecule, adverse events have tended to be mild, said Dr. Chapman, an attending physician on the melanoma/sarcoma service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York. Common grade 3 events in the current trial were arthralgia (3%), rash (3%), photosensitivity (3%), and fatigue (7%). About one-quarter of patients had to take a 1-to 3-week drug holiday or had to decrease their dosage because of side effects, typically rash. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin was seen in 23% of patients, but was easily treated with excision, he said.
A Disease or Subtypes
Dr. Chapman told reporters that genetic screening will have to become universal in melanoma, just as is essential in treating colorectal cancer. KRAS testing Screening can be completed in 1-2 weeks at active, participating centers.
The BRAF mutation is not the first example of a genetic subtype targeted in metastatic melanoma; Dr. Fisher and his colleagues reported dramatic results last year after targeting the c-KIT mutation with imatinib. Although the armamentarium is not deep for drugs that block BRAF, there are several available agents that target c-KIT, including nilotinib and sunitinib. This mutation, however, occurs in fewer than 5% of melanoma patients, and typically in the palms and soles and those melanomas or along the GI tract.
Although the signal from the PLX4032 trials is strong, the early data suggest that the single agent is not going to be enough, Dr. Fisher said. Future strategies will likely include combination therapy and the use of agents prior to the development of metastatic disease.
"We need complete remission. We need these tumors to melt away, "he said.
Dr. Chapman responded, "If you shrink the tumor too much with, it may not be as sensitive to PLX4032 VEGF [vascular endothelial growth factor] inhibition, but from a toxicity point of view, I don't think there's any reason why we couldn't combine them."
Dr. Richard Carvajal, a medical oncologist also with MSKCC, said in an interview that the clinical efficacy observed with PLX4032 nicely mirrors the preclinical data developed with various inhibitors of RAF and MEK, PLX4032 – either alone or in combination and that will play an important role – for the treatment of this particular molecular subgroup or melanoma in the future.